Tag Archives: Enterprise Architecture

Application Development, Brainstorm, Papers

Brainstorm for a conceptual paper

I have an idea to write  a conceptual paper on how an organization can make use of Enterprise Architecture Program (EAP) to ensure a better development and a more cost efficient approach to maintenance of the organization’s application portfolio.

I believe that the organization would be able to gain some form of advantage by mapping and later on ensuring a prioritized development of the applications. In this way the organizations should be able to make better use of its available resources.

More to come.

Standard
Initial Idea, Papers, Plans

Open Source Enterprise Architecture

I have chosen to write a draft for a paper dealing with the idea an concept of open source enterprise architecture.

The project will be initiated with the first paper. The paper will be based on a literature review. The literature review will include the following concepts and theories:

  1. Enterprise Architecture.
  2. Crowd-sourcing and open innovation.
  3. Management 2.0.
  4. Information systems theory.
  5. Systems thinking.

While I am dealing with these five concepts I will applying the hermeneutical circle. The hermeneutical is based upon the idea that the analyst would have to deal with his own hypothesis and assumptions on what the theory and texts deals with, but he should deal with the meaning of the sections of each of the selected texts and for that matter deal with the meaning of the whole texts in their context (time, culture, and history)

The analyst can go on, when he has an idea on the quality of the out come (analysis) e.g. if it is mature enough to go for making conclusions.

The approach has been illustrated below.

The approach

 

Standard
Deadlines, Plans

In a Rush

Currently I am working with drafting a proposal for an “industrial Ph.D.” position at Aarhus School of Business (ASB) and the KPMG. The KPMG has written a small but open introduction for the particular topics that they are interested in and as such I believe a proposal on Enterprise Architecture, management cybernetics and systems thinking is compatible with that.

I have about 30 days to hand in a project proposal to the KPMG and the ASB and as such I feel that I am able to face the challenge. If the proposal isn’t accepted by the ASB or the KPMG then I can consider the project and the outcome of the project as learning experience and after all knowledge is power.

Standard
Application Development, Brainstorm, Plans

Competitive Advantages by Implementing Enterprise Architecture

This blog post is a brainstorm on one of the topics that I finder rather interesting in the sphere of science, systems thinking and Enterprise Architecture. I think that it is of great importance that enterprises are able to achieve competitive advantages in order to cope with the increased competition that almost all enterprises will experience to enterprises across the globe realizes that they can gain access to customers, resources and profits as a result of gaining access to other form of resources that they would need in order to achieve their visions and missions.

As a result of the competition and for that matter the financial crisis the enterprises would have to find all resources needed to implement plans that can move the systems from the current situation (known the as-is situation) to a desired future situation (the to-be situation).

I assume that all enterprises consists of different segments and systems. A segment is a part of an enterprise that in itself serves a function e.g. a marketing department is a segment of an enterprise like the models that are made use of in the marketing department can be a considered a segment. The question of how to define segments of an enterprise is all about avoiding an unnecessary degree of complexity. Segments shares systems and systems have in this case been identified as both technical systems e.g. software, applications, hardware, buildings, technology etc. Likewise can humans, groups, social networks, communities of practices etc. be considered as systems.

The multiple forms of systems have to work together in some form in order to deliver the product or services to the customers or clients. It is my hypothesis that in order to achieve competitive advantages the enterprise’s decision makers would have to take charge of the enterprise and as such start align the various social systems in order to lay the foundation for creating synergies.

As I see it, synergies are the fundamentals for how to establish long term competitive advantages, and it is a part of my hypothesis that the enterprise will be able to achieve competitive advantages through:

  1. Informed decision making and governance.

  2. Articulation of plans to guide the various stakeholders of the enterprise can act upon.

  3. Development of applications, information systems and communities of practices that can ensure better business processes.

  4. The coordinated set of actions can change the state of the enterprise to a desired state.

I assume that the hypothesis can be investigated through the “cybernetics” paradigm that includes the assumption that social systems and information systems can be investigated and are connected in some way in the ecosystem of the enterprise.

The focus of Enterprise Architecture is to ensure that the various systems of the enterprise are dealt with through the investigation of the various systems of the enterprise in order to make the decision makers aware of how the complete system of the enterprise works and interacts with its surroundings and how the ecosystem impacts the enterprise.

Standard